Football fans are angry at having to change set-top boxes in 2010 when SingTel takes over the broadcasting rights to the EPL football games from Starhub.
This is an example of the waste and higher cost suffered by consumers through free market competition. Starhub and SingTel have be compete aggressively for the broadcasting rights and pass the higher cost, including the additional infrastructure cost, to the consumers.
Consumers have a choice. They can give up watching EPL football. I will take this choice in my family. Goodbye, EPL.
I wish to suggest the following approach to the Media Development Authority. Ask Starhub to set up a separate company to operate the cable infrastructure, and to allow all content providers to rent the channels to broadcast their contents. SingTel can rent the channels to broadcast the EPL games.
This approach is similar to what is being done for the distribution of electricity. One company is responsible for the distribution and billing the power that is generated by different operators.
There is a need for the distribution monopoly (for broadcasting or power supply) to be public owned or to be publicly regulated. We need to develop the expertise to handle these regulated matters, rather than take the easy way out to "leave it to the market". We cannot expect market forces to work when there is no true market, such as the case of a monopoly or similar structures.
In the regulating bodies, the consumers should be adequately represented by consumer advocates, rather than selected from the "establishment".
Tan Kin Lian
Sunday, October 4, 2009
Efficient train system
Europe has an efficient train system to connect its major cities. Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand can develop a similar system, but it requires the cooperations of these countries. Read my suggestion here.
RED Portal (15) - URA website
Question: How different is the RED portal from URA website that provide transaction prices?
Answer: I tried using the URA website to get transaction data before. It was quite difficult (at least from my personal experience).
I have designed the RED portal to be easier to use. I hope that visitors will find it easier to get all relevant information about a condo or housing project from the RED portal.
I also developed the concept of BMP (benchmark pric), AMX (amenity index) and comparables (i.e. similar projects in the same postal sector).
Answer: I tried using the URA website to get transaction data before. It was quite difficult (at least from my personal experience).
I have designed the RED portal to be easier to use. I hope that visitors will find it easier to get all relevant information about a condo or housing project from the RED portal.
I also developed the concept of BMP (benchmark pric), AMX (amenity index) and comparables (i.e. similar projects in the same postal sector).
Direction and future of our society
I spoke to a friend at a coffee shop about the changes that are necessary to make life better for the people of Singapore. He interrupted me on a few occasions and said, "that is engaging in politics; is it wise"?
I explained that I have no interest in "engaging in politics" but it does not prevent me from speaking as a citizen. We need more people to come forward to express their views about the direction and future of our society for our children and grandchildren.
My wishes for the future of Singapore:
a) Honesty - to be honest in our dealings and stating the truth
b) Fairness - to be fair and just
c) Courage - to have the courage to express our views
d) Positive - to express what is right (and not what is wrong)
e) Public service - to work in public interest and not for personal wealth
I explained that I have no interest in "engaging in politics" but it does not prevent me from speaking as a citizen. We need more people to come forward to express their views about the direction and future of our society for our children and grandchildren.
My wishes for the future of Singapore:
a) Honesty - to be honest in our dealings and stating the truth
b) Fairness - to be fair and just
c) Courage - to have the courage to express our views
d) Positive - to express what is right (and not what is wrong)
e) Public service - to work in public interest and not for personal wealth
Life insurance products can give good value
Life insurance products, including whole life, endowment, annuity and investment linked products, are useful to consumers if they are properly designed. They encourage consumers to make voluntary long term savings and manage the risk of premature death, disability or other calamities of life and improve the financial security of the insured families.
These products should be designed to be fair and give good value to consumers, by adopting the following approaches:
a) use the asset share method to distribute the fluctuating investment gains
b) keep distribution cost low
c) make the products transparent and easy to understand
There is also a need for the Government to review the tax incentive to encourage long term savings.
The asset share method is already adopted for the investment-linked products. They can be the platform for the future products.
It is possible to keep distribution cost low by educating the public on the purpose and value of life insurance products and the tax incentives that comes with them. When consumers want to buy insurance products, the sales people can be more productive in selling these products. The commission can be reduced or replaced by a fixed transaction fee.
It is useful for some tax incentive or subsidy to be provided for insurance products. If the interest earned in the life insurance fund pays a lower rate of tax (like in France) or is tax deferred (like in USA), the inherent advantage will make the life insurance products attractive to consumers. Alternatively, the premiums paid on insurance products can be allowed a modest rate of tax relief or subsidy (for people who do not pay tax).
To avoid any abuse of the tax incentive, a system of regulatory control has to be implemented, including meeting of performance indicators on cost, efficiency and benefit to consumers. This cannot be left to "the market". Predatory products that are unfair to consumers or designed to abuse the tax incentive should not be approved.
Singapore can learn from the positive experience of many countries in using tax incentives to develop a vibrant and efficient life insurance industry to encourage prudence, long term savings and financial security to the insured families.
I hope that the Government will consider my suggestion to provide tax incentive to encourage people to make voluntary savings for the financial security of their families.
Tan Kin Lian
These products should be designed to be fair and give good value to consumers, by adopting the following approaches:
a) use the asset share method to distribute the fluctuating investment gains
b) keep distribution cost low
c) make the products transparent and easy to understand
There is also a need for the Government to review the tax incentive to encourage long term savings.
The asset share method is already adopted for the investment-linked products. They can be the platform for the future products.
It is possible to keep distribution cost low by educating the public on the purpose and value of life insurance products and the tax incentives that comes with them. When consumers want to buy insurance products, the sales people can be more productive in selling these products. The commission can be reduced or replaced by a fixed transaction fee.
It is useful for some tax incentive or subsidy to be provided for insurance products. If the interest earned in the life insurance fund pays a lower rate of tax (like in France) or is tax deferred (like in USA), the inherent advantage will make the life insurance products attractive to consumers. Alternatively, the premiums paid on insurance products can be allowed a modest rate of tax relief or subsidy (for people who do not pay tax).
To avoid any abuse of the tax incentive, a system of regulatory control has to be implemented, including meeting of performance indicators on cost, efficiency and benefit to consumers. This cannot be left to "the market". Predatory products that are unfair to consumers or designed to abuse the tax incentive should not be approved.
Singapore can learn from the positive experience of many countries in using tax incentives to develop a vibrant and efficient life insurance industry to encourage prudence, long term savings and financial security to the insured families.
I hope that the Government will consider my suggestion to provide tax incentive to encourage people to make voluntary savings for the financial security of their families.
Tan Kin Lian
Restructure of taxi service
Survey: Free Market
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)