You can reduce the spread to 0.1% by investing in Australian dollars through the forex trading market. For example, if you wish to invest in AUD 50,000 you can buy the same amount in the forex market. Although you have to put in a margin of only 2%, i.e. AUD 1,000, you can keep the remaining 98% of the invested sum in Singapore deposit and enjoy the same investment result.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Investing in Foreign Currency
Some people like to invest in foreign currencies to earn a higher yield. For example, they can earn 3.1% on Australian dollars (1 month deposit) compared to 0.2% on Singapore dollars. However, they have to consider the spread of 1.7% in converting to Australian dollars and back. The higher interest rate is taken away entirely by the spread for short time deposits.
Credit risk in making advanced payments
Many customers paid a few thousand dollars on spa packages and lose the money when the spas closed down. If you have to pay in advance to enjoy a discount, do not pay for more than three months of services. Do not take the risk of paying for one or two years.
I do not know if the spa closed down due to bad business, or they were set up to deceive the customers. I hope that the authority will investigate if the owners had intended to collect deposits and run away with the money. If money is taken out by the directors for unauthorised purposes, it would amount to cheating. We should not allow this type of cheating to go unchecked.
Tan Kin Lian
I do not know if the spa closed down due to bad business, or they were set up to deceive the customers. I hope that the authority will investigate if the owners had intended to collect deposits and run away with the money. If money is taken out by the directors for unauthorised purposes, it would amount to cheating. We should not allow this type of cheating to go unchecked.
Tan Kin Lian
Friday, April 2, 2010
Poor financial future for Singaporeans
I feel sad for the people of Singapore. Most of them work hard and are frugal. They save for their future and for their children. But, when they come to retire, you do not have enough savings and are asked to continue to work longer.
What went wrong? Most of them get a poor deal from the financial products that they invested in. Take an example of a family which saves $500 a month over 35 years. They should have earned a return of 5% p.a. and received $570,000 for retirement,. But the yield obtained by most of them would probably be 2% p.a. giving them only $306,000 (or 54%). The difference of $264,000 (i.e. 46% of the total) went to pay the high earnings and profits of the financial services industry. I am not aware of any other country in the developed world where as much as 46% is taken away from the hard earned life time savings of the people.
If each family contribute $7,500 a year (i.e. $264,000 over 35 years), the total contribution from one million families would amount to nearly $8 billion a year. This is a lot of money. This is why the top executives in banks and life insurance companies can earn several million dollars a year. And in recent years, higher salaries are being paid for top executives who are willing to be unscrupulous in over-charging customers and giving them a poorer deal.
This arrangement works well for the board of directors, as their fees are benchmarked to the profits and to the government leaders whose remuneration are benchmarked to the top earners in the country. Of course, the people are condemned to a bleak financial future, but the government leaders do not seem to care.
Tan Kin Lian
What went wrong? Most of them get a poor deal from the financial products that they invested in. Take an example of a family which saves $500 a month over 35 years. They should have earned a return of 5% p.a. and received $570,000 for retirement,. But the yield obtained by most of them would probably be 2% p.a. giving them only $306,000 (or 54%). The difference of $264,000 (i.e. 46% of the total) went to pay the high earnings and profits of the financial services industry. I am not aware of any other country in the developed world where as much as 46% is taken away from the hard earned life time savings of the people.
If each family contribute $7,500 a year (i.e. $264,000 over 35 years), the total contribution from one million families would amount to nearly $8 billion a year. This is a lot of money. This is why the top executives in banks and life insurance companies can earn several million dollars a year. And in recent years, higher salaries are being paid for top executives who are willing to be unscrupulous in over-charging customers and giving them a poorer deal.
This arrangement works well for the board of directors, as their fees are benchmarked to the profits and to the government leaders whose remuneration are benchmarked to the top earners in the country. Of course, the people are condemned to a bleak financial future, but the government leaders do not seem to care.
Tan Kin Lian
Singapore Goal 2010
In 1998, Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong said in a National Day speech that one day Singapore could qualify to play in the World Cup. The Football Association of Singapore set Goal 2010 as the year that Singapore could achieve this dream. We are now at year 2010 and this dream is still far away. It seems that the last 10 years have been quite disappointing for Singapore on many angles, including sports. More information here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)