Saturday, February 13, 2010
Welfare in Singapore
Read the views in the Singapore Mind blog, and also the article by Economist magazine.
A nice name for big gambling
When you place your chips on a specific color (i.e. red or black) in a roulette game at a casino, you are gambling. The bigger the stake, the bigger is the gamble. You can gamble all of the money that you have in one bet. If you win, you win big. If you lose, you lose all.
Gambling is considered to be bad, especially if the bet is big and a loss may lead to financial ruin.
In recent years, banks have been gambling big, very big, to the tune of billions of dollars. They can bet on currency rates or on the chance of failures of any corporation. The types of bets have proliferated under the name of financial engineering and innovation. In some cases, they can gamble large amounts representing the capital of their shareholders and the deposits of their customers as well.
When the banks make these gambles, they do not call it a gamble. They call it by more respectable names, such as "trading:" or "risk management".
Gambling is bad, if the stakes are high and may cause financial ruin. It is bad for individuals. It is bad for businesses. It is bad for banks.
Tan Kin Lian
Gambling is considered to be bad, especially if the bet is big and a loss may lead to financial ruin.
In recent years, banks have been gambling big, very big, to the tune of billions of dollars. They can bet on currency rates or on the chance of failures of any corporation. The types of bets have proliferated under the name of financial engineering and innovation. In some cases, they can gamble large amounts representing the capital of their shareholders and the deposits of their customers as well.
When the banks make these gambles, they do not call it a gamble. They call it by more respectable names, such as "trading:" or "risk management".
Gambling is bad, if the stakes are high and may cause financial ruin. It is bad for individuals. It is bad for businesses. It is bad for banks.
Tan Kin Lian
Friday, February 12, 2010
Most Livable Cities - Surveys
Here are some surveys of the most livable cities around the world. Singapore missed the top 10 but is not too bad (e.g. ranked 18 in the Monocle Survey).
In the Mercer survey, Singapore ranked 34th based on 39 factors including political, economic, environmental, personal safety, health, education, transportation and other public service factors. Cities were compared to New York City which was given a base score of 100.
In the Mercer survey, Singapore ranked 34th based on 39 factors including political, economic, environmental, personal safety, health, education, transportation and other public service factors. Cities were compared to New York City which was given a base score of 100.
Vancouver is rated the world's most liveable city
I visited Vancouver last year and found it to be a nice city to live in. It has been rated the most liveable city in this report. Seven of the top 10 cities are in Canada and Australia. I hope that Singapore can learn from the lessons to improve the quality of life here.
Achive top position in life insurance sales
Life insurance companies compete yearly to achieve the top position in life insurance sales. This is an indicator of success and the productivity of the sales force. Several decades ago, the competition was based on annual premium on new policies, but in recent years, 10% of the single premiums are added to the annual premium to get the weighted premium as a measure of the sales.
To achieve sales and energize the sales agents, the life insurance companies introduce new and innovative products every year. These new products are variations of the old products, but have some changes to allow the agents to market the product. The variations may take the following forms:
a) a shorter period to pay the insurance premium
b) additional risks that are being covered
c) change from guaranteed to investment-linked payouts or back
As each new product is launched, the insurance agents have the chance to go back to the old customers and get the customers to terminate an existing policy and buy a new policy under the new product with the special features.
The customers are taken for a ride. They are not aware that the existing products give better value and that replacing the products is costly and against the interest of the consumer. In most cases, the consumer has to give up two years of premiums as upfront cost. The customers were also not aware they can buy separate insurance, at low cost, to cover any new needs. (I shall write separately on these matters).
Some insurance agents make a good living by replacing the existing policies of their customers every few years with the new "better" products, but making their customers poorer in the process. With the huge loses on the replaced products, the consumers are never able to accumulate sufficient savings for their retirements, even if they had been frugal.
An insurance agent can achieve the top sales position by making it possible for the sales agents to exploit the ignorance of their customers through the replacement of existing policies. The sales agents are happy with this arrangement, as they can earn high commission by selling the new policies, and it is easier to replace existing policies than to find new customers.
This bad practice of replacing policies, also known as "twisting" is made illegal in some countries. It is discouraged in Singapore, but the enforcement is weak.
An ethical insurance company will protect the interest of its customers by disallowing replacement of existing policies. An unethical company will make it easy for the sales agents to explot the ignorance of the existing customers to make new sales by replacing existing policies, and achieve the top sales position.
Tan Kin Lian
To achieve sales and energize the sales agents, the life insurance companies introduce new and innovative products every year. These new products are variations of the old products, but have some changes to allow the agents to market the product. The variations may take the following forms:
a) a shorter period to pay the insurance premium
b) additional risks that are being covered
c) change from guaranteed to investment-linked payouts or back
As each new product is launched, the insurance agents have the chance to go back to the old customers and get the customers to terminate an existing policy and buy a new policy under the new product with the special features.
The customers are taken for a ride. They are not aware that the existing products give better value and that replacing the products is costly and against the interest of the consumer. In most cases, the consumer has to give up two years of premiums as upfront cost. The customers were also not aware they can buy separate insurance, at low cost, to cover any new needs. (I shall write separately on these matters).
Some insurance agents make a good living by replacing the existing policies of their customers every few years with the new "better" products, but making their customers poorer in the process. With the huge loses on the replaced products, the consumers are never able to accumulate sufficient savings for their retirements, even if they had been frugal.
An insurance agent can achieve the top sales position by making it possible for the sales agents to exploit the ignorance of their customers through the replacement of existing policies. The sales agents are happy with this arrangement, as they can earn high commission by selling the new policies, and it is easier to replace existing policies than to find new customers.
This bad practice of replacing policies, also known as "twisting" is made illegal in some countries. It is discouraged in Singapore, but the enforcement is weak.
An ethical insurance company will protect the interest of its customers by disallowing replacement of existing policies. An unethical company will make it easy for the sales agents to explot the ignorance of the existing customers to make new sales by replacing existing policies, and achieve the top sales position.
Tan Kin Lian
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Logic9 (pocket sudoku) $4
Logic9 (pocket sudoku) vol 3 and 4 is now available at Internet shop. Each volume contains 128 puzzles at 4 levels (32 puzzles for each level). It can be kept in a pocket and can be used on the train, bus or plane. This is available at a discount of 15% during February (net price $3.40). Order here.
The Future That I Like To See
A reader asked me to summarize my views on social, economic and political topics, which have been expressed in various postings in this blog. I have made my first attempt here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)