Dear Mr Tan,
When I started work, I was introduced to an insurance agent. The insurance agent told me that I should buy a life insurance – one that can protect me and my family financially if anything should happen to me and if nothing happens, it served as a forced saving with good returns.
I was concerned about the non-guarantee return portion and was assured that in the history of the company; they have NEVER reduced the non-guarantee portion. It was divided into guaranteed and non-guaranteed portion to meet MAS guideline. I asked several insurance companies to quote me the same type of policy with the same coverage and bought one with the highest monetary return.
Throughout the years that followed, I started accumulating insurance policies for my husband, my children and myself from different insurance companies. At one time, I was paying $1,000 per month for my whole family’s insurance policies. I told myself that I am saving for my future, my children education, my retirement.
In 2003, I started receiving numerous letters from my insurance companies announcing that they would adjust the non-guaranteed returns. Some insurance companies even adjust their returns (downwards) every 6 months. The amount I thought I could accumulate for my retirement was substantially reduced by 30% to 40%. I had NEVER once default my monthly payment but the insurance companies did not fulfill what was promised to me at the point of sales. I was disheartened and felt cheated.
I told myself to hold on until the ‘break-even’ point. But within 3 years, the break-even point for most if not all my policies were pushed from the 12th year to the 15th year then to the 18th year.
I decided to terminate ALL my insurance policies for my family to cut my losses. By doing so, I lost more than 60% of what I had paid for those policies. I took back $20,000 and lost more than $30,000 for those policies that have not reach the 'break-even' point.
The insurance companies ask my reason for termination. When I told them about the reduced return, they told me that insurance was for protection and not for returns (saving). I had to remind them that returns (saving) was my consideration for taking the policies.
Later, I was persuaded into purchasing Mini Bond by the relationship manager of a major bank, who claimed that it was a high return and safe product. I bought the product. When Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008, I lost all the money. I was once again dubbed and conned, now by the bank!
I have learned my lesson. I do not trust anyone - insurance company or bank. I have lost my family and my life saving for being too trustful. I am so traumatised by all these that I now keep all my cash at home; as I will never know which bank will go bankrupt next. I just hope, from the start someone had told me not to buy insurance policies with saving element which was mentioned in Mr. Tan’s book.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment
Contoh Makalah Jurnal Skripsi Tesis
PDF Download PDF Search Engine
Art Gallery Artist - Contemporary Abstract Paintings and Graphics
History of Art, Artists & Art Movements
Top 30 Hot Music Downloads
Top Digital Songs
Christian Residential Drug Treatment
Donate Your Car San Francisco
Firm Law Mesothelioma Texas
Ms Exchange Server Hosting
Villa di Piazzano Cortona Italy Hotel
Windows Download Software
Windows Download Center
plastic surgery before and after korean
Fashion N style
Aliving Room Furniture
The Hotels Las Vegas
Acamping Sites
About Hilton Hotels
Women Hair Styles Short
Hair Styles Short Medium
2010 Haircuts Style
Hair Styles Short Hair
Insurance Quotes Online
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.